Home
+
About Us
Welcome Video
Company Overview
Our Purpose
A Message from our CEO
Testimonials
+
Leadership
Executive Team
Legal Team
Careers
Giving Back
Locations
Contact
Phia Certification
Diversity & Inclusion
Privacy Statement
Covid-19 Resources
+
Services
Learn - Independent Consultation & Evaluation
Plan - Phia Document Management
Plan - Plan Drafting Services
Save - Claims, Recovery & Subrogation Services
Save - Claim Negotiation
Save - Phia Unwrapped
Protect - Plan Appointed Claim Evaluator (PACE)
Protect - Patient Defender & Balance Billing
Phia International
-
Media
Covid-19
Webinars
Newsletters
Publications
Blog
Press Releases
Podcasts
Industry Terms
Guide to Understanding Subrogation
Moving To Self-Funded Health Plan Guide
Referenced-Based Pricing Explained
Hospital Price Transparency Guide
Balance-Billing: What Patients Need To Know
Employee Rights With COVID-19 Vaccines
The No Surprises Act Explained
Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act Explained
Understanding Non-Quantitative Treatment Limitations (NQTLs)
The Insulin Cap Bill Offers Hope for Americans With Diabetes
+
Members Area
+
FAQs
FAQ - Subrogation & Reimbursement
FAQ - Mass Tort Subrogation & Reimbursement
Questionnaire Response
Make A Payment
888-986-0080
info@phiagroup.com
Questionnaire Response
Blog
Podcasts
|
Login
Home
About Us
Welcome Video
Company Overview
Our Purpose
A Message from our CEO
Testimonials
Leadership
Executive Team
Legal Team
Careers
Giving Back
Locations
Contact
Phia Certification
Diversity & Inclusion
Privacy Statement
Covid-19 Resources
Services
Learn - Independent Consultation & Evaluation
Plan - Phia Document Management
Plan - Plan Drafting Services
Save - Claims, Recovery & Subrogation Services
Save - Claim Negotiation
Save - Phia Unwrapped
Protect - Plan Appointed Claim Evaluator (PACE)
Protect - Patient Defender & Balance Billing
Phia International
Media
Covid-19
Webinars
Newsletters
Publications
Blog
Press Releases
Podcasts
Industry Terms
Guide to Understanding Subrogation
Moving To Self-Funded Health Plan Guide
Referenced-Based Pricing Explained
Hospital Price Transparency Guide
Balance-Billing: What Patients Need To Know
Employee Rights With COVID-19 Vaccines
The No Surprises Act Explained
Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act Explained
Understanding Non-Quantitative Treatment Limitations (NQTLs)
The Insulin Cap Bill Offers Hope for Americans With Diabetes
Members Area
FAQs
FAQ - Subrogation & Reimbursement
FAQ - Mass Tort Subrogation & Reimbursement
Questionnaire Response
Make A Payment
Posts
Media
>
Posts
Covid-19
Webinars
Newsletters
Publications
Blog
Press Releases
Podcasts
Industry Terms
Guide to Understanding Subrogation
Moving To Self-Funded Health Plan Guide
Referenced-Based Pricing Explained
Hospital Price Transparency Guide
Balance-Billing: What Patients Need To Know
Employee Rights With COVID-19 Vaccines
The No Surprises Act Explained
Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act Explained
Understanding Non-Quantitative Treatment Limitations (NQTLs)
The Insulin Cap Bill Offers Hope for Americans With Diabetes
Phia Group Media
Phia Group Media
Spinning the Web of the Plan Document
On July 7, 2017 in
Blog
,
Health Insurance
,
Healthcare Costs
,
Plan
,
Plan Sponsor
,
Self Funding
,
Self Insurance
,
Stop loss
By: Kelly Dempsey, Esq.
(No, this isn’t about spiders.)
The date was somewhere around August 25, 1999. The location was my 10th grade biology class. I remember taking in the scenery of a new classroom and looking at all the pictures and quotes my teacher had up on the walls. One in particular caught my eye:
“I know you think you understand what you thought I said, but I’m not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.”
Once your head stops spinning, we can continue…
I’ve since learned this quote is attributed to the former head of the Federal Reserve Board, Alan Greenspan. The context of this quote is still foreign to me, but I believe it can be applied to just about anything – so let’s apply it to plan documents.
In general there are several entities involved in the process of administering an ERISA self-funded medical plan document, but ultimately the plan sponsor is responsible for ensuring the terms of the plan document meet the needs of the plan and its members. The plan administrator then has the fiduciary duty to administer the plan in accordance with the terms of the plan document. So when is the last time that you, the plan sponsor, have read the plan document cover to cover?
Plan documents have to be reviewed and revised for any number of reasons, including regulatory changes – but sometimes plan documents are changed when the plan moves to a different claims administrator (i.e., hires a new TPA to administer claims, or moves from an ASO to a TPA or vice versa). The “rules” each claims administrator sets related to the plan document’s format may vary. Some TPAs will administer the document as-is. Some TPAs prefer to use their own plan document template, which the plan sponsor can either adopt from scratch or conform its existing benefits to.
I’ve written about “gap traps” before, and while this isn’t a really one of those as we typically use the term (which is most often relevant to gaps between a plan document and a stop loss policy), a type of gap arises if a restated document doesn’t mirror the prior plan document. For example, the prior plan document had an illegal acts exclusion that applies for any act that carries with it a potential prison sentence of one year. The restated plan document, however, doesn’t include this specific prison sentence limitation, which means the plan essentially will have to exclude more claims in order to comply with the terms of the plan document (such as, for instance, a DWI, which does not carry with it a sentence of up to one year, but is an illegal act!). While this would comport with the terms of the plan document, it is something for which plan members – and even the plan administrator – may not be prepared.
Another example is a situation where the prior plan contained a medical tourism program that includes many non-U.S. locations, so the plan did not include a foreign travel exclusion. When the two plan documents were “merged” such that the existing document and new format are combined, the new plan document accidentally contained both an international medical tourism program as well as a new exclusion for non-U.S. claims (because foreign travel exclusions are still fairly common). Needless to say, that type of contradiction can cause a slew of problems (including a potential gap with the stop loss policy).
The addition of a new exclusion, or even apparently minor verbiage changes within an existing exclusion (or definition, or benefit, or just about anything else, for that matter), can seem very insignificant, but has the potential for dire consequences if the intent of the plan is not reflected as clearly as possible.
So, a few questions for employers, TPAs, consultants, brokers, and anyone else involved in plan document drafting:
• Does the plan document actually say what the plan sponsor wants it to say?
• Does it clearly outline what is covered?
• Do the exclusions align with what the plan wants to be excluded?
• If a plan document has been recently restated, have you confirmed that the terms of the new plan document are the same as the prior plan document?
It’s always best to triple-check these types of things. Happy reading!
Tagged With:
Plan Documents