Home
About Us
Welcome Video
Company Overview
Our Purpose
A Message From our CEO
Giving Back
Locations
Testimonials
Leadership
Executive Team
Legal Team
Contact
Diversity & Inclusion
Privacy Statement
Technology
Careers
Services
Learn - Independent Consultation & Evaluation
Plan - Phia Document Management (PDM)
Plan - Plan Drafting Services
Save - Subrogation & Recovery Services
Save - Claim Negotiation & Signoff (CNS)
Save - Phia Unwrapped
Save - No Surprises Act (NSA)
Protect - Plan Appointed Claim Evaluator (PACE)
Protect - Balance Billing Resolution
Phia International
Media
Webinars
Newsletters
Publications
Blog
Press Releases
Podcasts
Industry Articles
Guide to Understanding Subrogation
Moving To Self-Funded Health Plan Guide
Referenced-Based Pricing Explained
Hospital Price Transparency Guide
Balance-Billing: What Patients Need To Know
Employee Rights With COVID-19 Vaccines
The No Surprises Act Explained
Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act Explained
Understanding Non-Quantitative Treatment Limitations (NQTLs)
The Insulin Cap Bill Offers Hope for Americans With Diabetes
In-Network vs Out-of-Network Claims
Industry Terms
Members Area
FAQs
FAQ - Subrogation & Reimbursement
FAQ - Mass Tort Subrogation & Reimbursement
Questionnaire Response
Make A Payment
|
Login
GO
X
Home
About Us
Welcome Video
Company Overview
Our Purpose
A Message From our CEO
Giving Back
Locations
Testimonials
Leadership
Executive Team
Legal Team
Contact
Diversity & Inclusion
Privacy Statement
Technology
Careers
Services
Learn - Independent Consultation & Evaluation
Plan - Phia Document Management (PDM)
Plan - Plan Drafting Services
Save - Subrogation & Recovery Services
Save - Claim Negotiation & Signoff (CNS)
Save - Phia Unwrapped
Save - No Surprises Act (NSA)
Protect - Plan Appointed Claim Evaluator (PACE)
Protect - Balance Billing Resolution
Phia International
Media
Webinars
Newsletters
Publications
Blog
Press Releases
Podcasts
Industry Articles
Guide to Understanding Subrogation
Moving To Self-Funded Health Plan Guide
Referenced-Based Pricing Explained
Hospital Price Transparency Guide
Balance-Billing: What Patients Need To Know
Employee Rights With COVID-19 Vaccines
The No Surprises Act Explained
Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act Explained
Understanding Non-Quantitative Treatment Limitations (NQTLs)
The Insulin Cap Bill Offers Hope for Americans With Diabetes
In-Network vs Out-of-Network Claims
Industry Terms
Members Area
FAQs
FAQ - Subrogation & Reimbursement
FAQ - Mass Tort Subrogation & Reimbursement
Questionnaire Response
Make A Payment
Home
+
About Us
Welcome Video
+
Company Overview
Our Purpose
A Message From our CEO
Giving Back
Locations
Testimonials
+
Leadership
Executive Team
Legal Team
Contact
Diversity & Inclusion
Privacy Statement
Technology
Careers
+
Services
Learn - Independent Consultation & Evaluation
Plan - Phia Document Management (PDM)
Plan - Plan Drafting Services
Save - Subrogation & Recovery Services
Save - Claim Negotiation & Signoff (CNS)
Save - Phia Unwrapped
Save - No Surprises Act (NSA)
Protect - Plan Appointed Claim Evaluator (PACE)
Protect - Balance Billing Resolution
Phia International
-
Media
Webinars
Newsletters
Publications
Blog
Press Releases
Podcasts
+
Industry Articles
Guide to Understanding Subrogation
Moving To Self-Funded Health Plan Guide
Referenced-Based Pricing Explained
Hospital Price Transparency Guide
Balance-Billing: What Patients Need To Know
Employee Rights With COVID-19 Vaccines
The No Surprises Act Explained
Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act Explained
Understanding Non-Quantitative Treatment Limitations (NQTLs)
The Insulin Cap Bill Offers Hope for Americans With Diabetes
In-Network vs Out-of-Network Claims
Industry Terms
+
Members Area
+
FAQs
FAQ - Subrogation & Reimbursement
FAQ - Mass Tort Subrogation & Reimbursement
Questionnaire Response
Make A Payment
Posts
Media
>
Posts
Webinars
Newsletters
Publications
Blog
Press Releases
Podcasts
Industry Articles
Guide to Understanding Subrogation
Moving To Self-Funded Health Plan Guide
Referenced-Based Pricing Explained
Hospital Price Transparency Guide
Balance-Billing: What Patients Need To Know
Employee Rights With COVID-19 Vaccines
The No Surprises Act Explained
Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act Explained
Understanding Non-Quantitative Treatment Limitations (NQTLs)
The Insulin Cap Bill Offers Hope for Americans With Diabetes
In-Network vs Out-of-Network Claims
Industry Terms
Phia Group
Phia Group Media
Trump Administration Birth Control Roll Back
On October 9, 2017 in
Affordable Care Act
,
Blog
By: Jen McCormick, Esq.
The Trump Administration announced an impactful change via an interim final rule, effective immediately (i.e. October 6, 2017) to the ACA’s contraceptive mandate for some self-funded plans and their third party administrators.
These new HHS regulations allow a larger pool of entities (i.e. employers) to opt out of the ACA preventive care contraception requirements. Specifically, the regulations allow (1) employers with contrary religious beliefs and (2) organizations and small businesses with objections based on their moral convictions to opt out of this women’s preventive care mandate.
Prior to October 6, 2017, this exemption was limited to certain houses of worship, nonprofits with religious affiliations and closely held for-profit entities. Now, a much broader scope of entities (i.e. nonprofit organizations, for-profit companies, publicly traded companies, and educational institutions) are permitted to claim a religious objection.
This change will permit a much larger pool of companies to carve-out certain women’s preventive care benefit under their health plan. Thus, with renewal season almost in full force, the applicability of this rule for self-funded plans and their administrators needs immediate clarification.
Prior to this interim final rule, the regulations required third party administrators who administered the self-funded medical plan for those entities who could opt out of the mandate (via an exemption or accommodation, etc) to otherwise arrange for these women’s preventive benefits. While we have yet to see the finalized rules, it appears this requirement remains untouched. As a result, it seems that this could have a big impact on groups wanting to make this modification to their current benefit structure (or even those wishing to make an immediate amendment to their plan design). Third party administrators should be on the look-out and ensure they have processes and procedures in place to address this internally.
Note that this is still a pending issue and rescission of coverage is still not permitted under the ACA, and we do expect additional clarification and guidance. For example, it is expected that Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healy will push against this regulation.
Tagged With:
ACA